<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alignment Of Project Dimensions: A Balancing Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhut.com/alignment-of-project-dimensions-a-balancing-act/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhut.com/alignment-of-project-dimensions-a-balancing-act</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 03:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Tailby</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/alignment-of-project-dimensions-a-balancing-act/comment-page-1#comment-11175</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tailby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/?p=4118#comment-11175</guid>
		<description>I agree with the main points of this article. Taking on a fixed price for an undefined scope is a nightmare for the vendor.

Yet most customers want a fixed price contract for a solution that is defined only in the highest level and often after only a few initial meetings.

Purchasers seem to think that software development projects are like getting a plumber to quote for putting in a new bathroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the main points of this article. Taking on a fixed price for an undefined scope is a nightmare for the vendor.</p>
<p>Yet most customers want a fixed price contract for a solution that is defined only in the highest level and often after only a few initial meetings.</p>
<p>Purchasers seem to think that software development projects are like getting a plumber to quote for putting in a new bathroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

