<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Technology Solve the Project Execution Problem?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhut.com/can-technology-solve-the-project-execution-problem/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhut.com/can-technology-solve-the-project-execution-problem</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: curt finch</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/can-technology-solve-the-project-execution-problem/comment-page-1#comment-22559</link>
		<dc:creator>curt finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/?p=5532#comment-22559</guid>
		<description>I couldn't agree more.  A good baseline is critical to measuring progress towards successful project execution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  A good baseline is critical to measuring progress towards successful project execution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen B Alleman</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/can-technology-solve-the-project-execution-problem/comment-page-1#comment-21904</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen B Alleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/?p=5532#comment-21904</guid>
		<description>All good stuff, except the "balancing" of cost, schedule, and quality (technical performance). See

http://herdingcats.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/06/trading-off-cost-schedule-and-technical-performance-is-a-ponzi-scheme.html

For some comments on this common approach to managing projects to leads to serious problems. If don't have a credible baseline that you manage changes, then making these "trades" (balancing) is a Ponzi scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good stuff, except the &#8220;balancing&#8221; of cost, schedule, and quality (technical performance). See</p>
<p><a href="http://herdingcats.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/06/trading-off-cost-schedule-and-technical-performance-is-a-ponzi-scheme.html" rel="nofollow">http://herdingcats.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/06/trading-off-cost-schedule-and-technical-performance-is-a-ponzi-scheme.html</a></p>
<p>For some comments on this common approach to managing projects to leads to serious problems. If don&#8217;t have a credible baseline that you manage changes, then making these &#8220;trades&#8221; (balancing) is a Ponzi scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

