<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Change Management - Change Management Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process/comment-page-1#comment-87792</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process#comment-87792</guid>
		<description>In my experience, Change Control Boards that do not have user representatives as voting members are doomed to failure.  It should be up to the users to set the priority of each change request and determine the release (time permitting)in which the change will be included. If the users have no vote and can only propose change they will end up feeling powerless and very unhappy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, Change Control Boards that do not have user representatives as voting members are doomed to failure.  It should be up to the users to set the priority of each change request and determine the release (time permitting)in which the change will be included. If the users have no vote and can only propose change they will end up feeling powerless and very unhappy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Control Change Requests - PM Hut</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process/comment-page-1#comment-11833</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Control Change Requests - PM Hut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process#comment-11833</guid>
		<description>[...] meant to solve? You need to be able to make this distinction before you take the next step in the change management process. Change requests are like mini business cases and should contain the elements the business case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] meant to solve? You need to be able to make this distinction before you take the next step in the change management process. Change requests are like mini business cases and should contain the elements the business case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change Management - Tracking Change - PM Hut</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process/comment-page-1#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Change Management - Tracking Change - PM Hut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process#comment-808</guid>
		<description>[...] Change Management - Change Management Process [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Change Management - Change Management Process [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennet Simonton</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process/comment-page-1#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennet Simonton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process#comment-805</guid>
		<description>Change is easy, if and only if the workforce has been provided with a work environment which allows them to develop a strong sense of ownership thus unleashing their full potential of creativity, innovation, productivity, motivation and commitment.  Without this environment, change is resisted and becomes a battle often lost.

Unfortunately, most companies use the traditional top-down command and control approach to managing their employees, an approach which concentrates on producing goals, targets, visions, orders and other directives in order to control the workforce and thereby achieve organizational success. Focusing on giving direction prevents these managers from doing much of anything else. Thus top-down treats employees like robots in the "shut up and listen, I know better than you" mode, and rarely if ever listens to them.

By so doing this approach ignores every employee's basic need to be heard and to be respected. In addition, not listening to employees makes top management ignorant of what is really going on in the workplace thus making their directives misguided at best and irrelevant at worst. Employees become demotivated, demoralized and disrespected and thus "led" to treat their work, their customers, and their bosses with the same level of disrespect.

Thus, top-down produces the exact opposite environment to what is needed.

To better understand the right way and the wrong way to manage human capital, please read the article &lt;a href="http://www.bensimonton.com/Leadership,%20Good%20or%20Bad.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;"Leadership, Good or Bad"&lt;/a&gt;

Best regards, Ben
Author "Leading People to be Highly Motivated and Committed"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change is easy, if and only if the workforce has been provided with a work environment which allows them to develop a strong sense of ownership thus unleashing their full potential of creativity, innovation, productivity, motivation and commitment.  Without this environment, change is resisted and becomes a battle often lost.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, most companies use the traditional top-down command and control approach to managing their employees, an approach which concentrates on producing goals, targets, visions, orders and other directives in order to control the workforce and thereby achieve organizational success. Focusing on giving direction prevents these managers from doing much of anything else. Thus top-down treats employees like robots in the &#8220;shut up and listen, I know better than you&#8221; mode, and rarely if ever listens to them.</p>
<p>By so doing this approach ignores every employee&#8217;s basic need to be heard and to be respected. In addition, not listening to employees makes top management ignorant of what is really going on in the workplace thus making their directives misguided at best and irrelevant at worst. Employees become demotivated, demoralized and disrespected and thus &#8220;led&#8221; to treat their work, their customers, and their bosses with the same level of disrespect.</p>
<p>Thus, top-down produces the exact opposite environment to what is needed.</p>
<p>To better understand the right way and the wrong way to manage human capital, please read the article <a href="http://www.bensimonton.com/Leadership,%20Good%20or%20Bad.htm" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Leadership, Good or Bad&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Best regards, Ben<br />
Author &#8220;Leading People to be Highly Motivated and Committed&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LouisvillePM</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process/comment-page-1#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>LouisvillePM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process#comment-806</guid>
		<description>Nick,

Great breakdown.  I know that I've been intimidated by "the change management process" in the past.  I'm featuring your no nonsense approach in the LouisvillePM Tools &amp; Techniques forum.

&lt;a href="http://louisvillepm.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=2191229%3ATopic%3A2141" title="Nick Jenkins on Change Management" rel="nofollow"&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>Great breakdown.  I know that I&#8217;ve been intimidated by &#8220;the change management process&#8221; in the past.  I&#8217;m featuring your no nonsense approach in the LouisvillePM Tools &amp; Techniques forum.</p>
<p><a href="http://louisvillepm.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=2191229%3ATopic%3A2141" title="Nick Jenkins on Change Management" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change Management - Introduction - PM Hut</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process/comment-page-1#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Change Management - Introduction - PM Hut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/change-management-change-management-process#comment-807</guid>
		<description>[...] Change Management - Change Management Process [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Change Management - Change Management Process [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
