Demand Management

February 16, 2009 | Author: PM Hut | Filed under: Project Management Best Practices,Project Management Definitions

Demand Management
By James Parnitzke

Demand management defined means we are meeting customer needs consistently, meeting expectations on a regular basis. It doesn’t mean we drop everything to address an urgent priority in our partners mind every time we are asked. Maybe if is both urgent and important. Maybe. But consider that high performance organizations usually spend less than 10% of their time on urgent and unplanned work. This has been proven to be the single characteristic (metric) that can be used to indicate extremely high levels of operational excellence, compliance, security, and good working relationships with business partners. High performance organizations:

  • Build and complete new projects for the business The ideal organization is completing projects on time, with reliable quality, and delivering needed capabilities to the business. These projects are planned work, and anything that detracts from completing it is unplanned work. If developers spend more than 10% of their time on emergency break/fix issues escalated from operations, project commitments suffer, almost guaranteeing late projects.
  • Operate existing services and use assets effectively, efficiently, and securely Services are performing as advertised and promised, with a reliable level of quality; customers are satisfied; controls exist so that management detects variance early and can repair it in a planned and orderly manner; and controls exist to foster a culture of compliance, helping management achieve business goals and satisfy auditors.

You have got to get this right.

Here is a quick way to understand where you are and what kind of actions you can take to begin managing this key discipline to lead a high performance organization.

First, get a handle on the true capacity constraints you are managing to. Calculate the entire man-hours resource pool required and available and then multiply this amount by 80%. This is an effective planned capacity. Group the work characteristics so that Maintenance and Production Support is clearly identified and separated from development and project related activity. Leaving 10%-12% means professional staff can be developed, trained, and use a manageable amount of free time to actually research tools and methods to offset the times when a true emergency occurs and then can be expected to work at 100% or above levels. The other 8% – 10% should be reserved for unplanned, unforeseen activity. Develop a true plan of record to uncover any gaps from what is planned and the capacity constraints you have identified. Use this plan to prioritize with the business so that the important and urgent work still gets done and shortfalls (expectations) can be managed. This will be required anyway to demonstrate need if additional headcount is needed.

Second, evaluate your Plan of Record (it does exist right?) and make sure you share this often within the organization to guide planning efforts or help resolve prioritization issues. Conflicting demands are addressed on a reactive basis so try to mitigate confusion and ambiguity introduced through shifting priorities, assignments, and resource allocations that can create a significant amount of unplanned activity. Make sure Create/Build and Operate/Maintain missions are clear and unambiguous among the professional staff tasked with providing both roles concurrently. Ruthlessly pursue this clarity of mission. Not doing so will introduce a significant amount of rework and waste. Watch carefully for symptoms and extraordinary amounts of non-value added essential activity (e.g. meeting after meeting with all-hands for example) to overcome the poor communication a good plan of record will overcome.

Third, ensure adequate resources have been identified and allocated to the scheduled tasks at the right time. Sounds simple, but in many cases I have witnessed first hand the same resources committed two and three times over which is a direct result of poor coordination and communications. Use the Project Management Office (PMO – you have one right?) to examine project plans to make sure they are not populated with unamed resources or roles without an association to an actual resource. TBD is not good enough here. If uncovered in your work plans, this will only lead to further ambiguity and confusion over committed resources. And there will be hell to pay when it comes time to deliver real work.

Fourth, make sure there is evidence of resource pooling or sharing concepts in use. If not, there may be a lack of skill and experience with program management in general or some fundamental misunderstanding of basic IT management concepts. A good place to start is in production support activities. If there is one resource allocated and no back up or cross-training occurring you are in trouble. Get your resume up to date and hope for the best.

Last, and most important – have your PMO regularly report to you the ratio of unplanned to planned activity. If they can’t do this, ask why. There may be a skills or competency issue. There may be a capacity or set of processes that are broken. This may be your best shot at managing demand, judging capacity, and understanding how well your organization is managing to objectives. This is an essential make or break early-warning metric to quickly realize when your organization’s ability to respond to and overcome demand management challenges needs attention.

There is much more to this subject, intend to explore some real world examples in the coming weeks. I welcome your thoughts and comments on this important management challenge.

James Parnitzke has a hands-on technology executive, trusted partner, advisor, software publisher, and widely recognized database management and enterprise architecture thought leader. Over his career he has served in executive, technical, publisher (commercial software), and practice management roles across a wide range of industries. Now a highly sought after technology management advisor and hands-on practitioner his customers include many of the Fortune 500 as well as emerging businesses where he is known for taking complex challenges and solving for them across all levels of the customer’s organization delivering distinctive value and lasting relationships. James runs the corner office guy, a blog where he writes about Project Management as well as other management topics.

2 people have left comments

American companies need more of the effective management. The first thing to do is to create a functional leadership performance and look for the threats. According to Med Yones, leadership guru, when management tends to focus much on one management area, e.g., sales and has no time to manage the internal organization challenges, dysfunction creeps in and takes hold. In order to build and sustain high-performance teams, leadership and human resource managers should keep an eye open for all major symptoms and treat the root causes before it becomes too late. More information are provided in the following article

Henna Duck wrote on February 24, 2009 - 12:26 pm | Visit Link

hello dear
i want a article about “demant management” in industrial engineering in 15-20 page.
please send me
thank you.

alireza wrote on March 23, 2010 - 5:32 am | Visit Link

feel free to leave a comment

Comment Guidelines: Basic XHTML is allowed (a href, strong, em, code). All line breaks and paragraphs are automatically generated. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Email addresses will never be published. Keep it PG-13 people!

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

All fields marked with " * " are required.

Project Management Categories