<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manage Project Issues and Risks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhut.com/manage-project-issues-and-risks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhut.com/manage-project-issues-and-risks</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Veronica Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/manage-project-issues-and-risks/comment-page-1#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/?p=3196#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>So true, very few project managers consider risks and issues associated with any project. Very few products allow this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true, very few project managers consider risks and issues associated with any project. Very few products allow this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Management Tools &#38; Techniques</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/manage-project-issues-and-risks/comment-page-1#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Management Tools &#38; Techniques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/?p=3196#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>Identifying risk can be made more compelling by reframing it. You aren't just finding risks: you're identifying opportunities. Any generic risk can be recast as a chance to mitigate an otherwise inevitable problem: if you're manufacturing a product, and rely on a single dodgy competitor for a crucial component, it's better to reimagine the problem as one of either finding a new supplier or stockpiling the component in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Identifying risk can be made more compelling by reframing it. You aren&#8217;t just finding risks: you&#8217;re identifying opportunities. Any generic risk can be recast as a chance to mitigate an otherwise inevitable problem: if you&#8217;re manufacturing a product, and rely on a single dodgy competitor for a crucial component, it&#8217;s better to reimagine the problem as one of either finding a new supplier or stockpiling the component in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

