<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantitative Risk Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhut.com/quantitative-risk-analysis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhut.com/quantitative-risk-analysis</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Qualitative Risk Analysis and the Risk Rating Matrix - PM Hut</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/quantitative-risk-analysis/comment-page-1#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>Qualitative Risk Analysis and the Risk Rating Matrix - PM Hut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/quantitative-risk-analysis#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>[...] Within your project, you have to determine which of these risks deserve additional analysis. Typically you&#8217;d say the risks with a medium score or higher should be taken seriously and are promoted to quantitative risk analysis. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Within your project, you have to determine which of these risks deserve additional analysis. Typically you&#8217;d say the risks with a medium score or higher should be taken seriously and are promoted to quantitative risk analysis. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

