<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RACI and RACI-VS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhut.com/raci-and-raci-vs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhut.com/raci-and-raci-vs</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shim Marom</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/raci-and-raci-vs/comment-page-1#comment-10313</link>
		<dc:creator>Shim Marom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/?p=4037#comment-10313</guid>
		<description>Thanks for demonstrating the simple truth that project management is not just about following tools and techniques but also about using common sense. Sure you could, if you wish, use the standard RAM proposed by the PMBOK. But equally, if the circumstances necessitate or support it, you could extend or amend the standard RAM by adding or changing some of the categories to suit your controlling requirements. Some hard core PM's might not like it but my view is that no single tool is sacred and the PM has the authority, and indeed the responsibility, to adapt the tools to suit his/her project requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for demonstrating the simple truth that project management is not just about following tools and techniques but also about using common sense. Sure you could, if you wish, use the standard RAM proposed by the PMBOK. But equally, if the circumstances necessitate or support it, you could extend or amend the standard RAM by adding or changing some of the categories to suit your controlling requirements. Some hard core PM&#8217;s might not like it but my view is that no single tool is sacred and the PM has the authority, and indeed the responsibility, to adapt the tools to suit his/her project requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

