July 18, 2012 | Author: PM Hut | Filed under: Project Management Best Practices
The Clash of the Priorities
By Susan Peterson
Project managers juggle a multitude of priorities. Often, the number and magnitude of priorities may seem overwhelming and even in conflict with one another. How project managers deal with numerous priorities can make or break a project and can directly influence the perception of the success of a project. It can be difficult to objectively apply one standard to a wide variety of priorities, but that is what project managers must do. It is especially challenging when several projects have to be managed simultaneously. The following decision criteria can aid in sorting through a mountain of priorities whether on one project or on multiple projects.
Life or Death
This criterion may sound overly drastic, but it crisply focuses one’s perspective. Unless the activity/event will doom or lead to the demise of the project (or the project manager), it is probably not a top priority item. People who have faced death and survived have been known to say after such experiences that everything else is “child’s play”.
Source of the Priority
Is the priority being driven by personal or political whim? Is the priority “driver” someone who specializes in creating crises? In these types of situations the project manager should assess the strength and importance of the priority driver as well as the impact on the overall project. Treating the cause of the priority rather than the symptomatic pressure is more effective in reducing the number and severity of high priority items. Jumping from one “top priority” item to another only encourages the drivers of the priorities and may actually prolong the agony by increasing the volume of priority items.
It is often only the project manager who realizes that priorities are in conflict. For example, one department involved in a project may be incentivized to complete its activities rapidly ahead of schedule without regard for quality. Another department involved in the project may actually experience delays in completing its assigned tasks due to inferior handoffs from the other department. In this type of situation it is the project manager who must educate project participants in the realities of not sacrificing the project for the benefit of a single component.
Rapidly Shifting Priorities
Sometimes priorities are changed so quickly and so often that a project manager can feel that he/she is “twisting in the wind”. When priorities shift constantly, a project manager must exercise judgment to determine if the current shift is just part of the ongoing decision instability or is actually a necessary change. This situation calls for the project manager to be the “calm in the storm” in objectively assessing the need for the shift in priorities. Otherwise, stakeholders quickly learn to bombard the project manager with urgent priority requests.
In conclusion it’s a fact of project management that effective priority management is crucial to “staying the course” through the turbulence that accompanies projects.
© 2012 Susan Peterson, All Rights Reserved - No part of this article may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission.
Susan Peterson, M.B.A., PMP, is a consultant who manages diverse programs and projects in both the private and public sectors for individual organizations and consortia. She also conducts enterprise assessments of project portfolio management practices. Prior to establishing her consulting practice Susan led major efforts for Fortune 100 organizations throughout the United States. She teaches the Project Management Simulation capstone course as well as the Project Portfolio Management course in the University of California, San Diego, Project Management certificate program and is a member of the curriculum committee. She can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org.
No comments yet.