<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Important Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhut.com/the-most-important-project/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhut.com/the-most-important-project</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pradeep Bhanot</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/the-most-important-project/comment-page-1#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Pradeep Bhanot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/the-most-important-project#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>Jorge, I agree. The most important is the one you are working on.

I have been in a situation where I was working on the "the big project",
which consumed the most resources and several smaller ones. I found
that the smaller, more manageable projects drove value faster and helped
me maintain a high level of satisfaction, which would have waned if all
I had was the mega project. Even the execs enjoyed the gate reviews for
the smaller projects, because the risks levels were so much lower and
the gains more assured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jorge, I agree. The most important is the one you are working on.</p>
<p>I have been in a situation where I was working on the &#8220;the big project&#8221;,<br />
which consumed the most resources and several smaller ones. I found<br />
that the smaller, more manageable projects drove value faster and helped<br />
me maintain a high level of satisfaction, which would have waned if all<br />
I had was the mega project. Even the execs enjoyed the gate reviews for<br />
the smaller projects, because the risks levels were so much lower and<br />
the gains more assured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

