<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traditional Project Management vs. Agile Development with SaaS Projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhut.com/traditional-project-management-vs-agile-development-with-saas-projects/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhut.com/traditional-project-management-vs-agile-development-with-saas-projects</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PM Hut</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/traditional-project-management-vs-agile-development-with-saas-projects/comment-page-1#comment-18353</link>
		<dc:creator>PM Hut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/?p=4928#comment-18353</guid>
		<description>Hi T.,

I don't think the article is there to promote Agile, it is only pointing out that Agile was a better way to manage an SaaS project than waterfall as experienced by the author.

I was told by Dan Orlando (the author) that he's going to expand tremendously on the all the points mentioned in the article and I believe he'll be discussing your points as well (strengths of traditional PM and weaknesses of Agile in SaaS implementations).

Waterfall vs. Agile is always a hot topic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi T.,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the article is there to promote Agile, it is only pointing out that Agile was a better way to manage an SaaS project than waterfall as experienced by the author.</p>
<p>I was told by Dan Orlando (the author) that he&#8217;s going to expand tremendously on the all the points mentioned in the article and I believe he&#8217;ll be discussing your points as well (strengths of traditional PM and weaknesses of Agile in SaaS implementations).</p>
<p>Waterfall vs. Agile is always a hot topic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Enright</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhut.com/traditional-project-management-vs-agile-development-with-saas-projects/comment-page-1#comment-18351</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Enright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhut.com/?p=4928#comment-18351</guid>
		<description>This post has a lot of factual errors and, IMHO, is just written to promote agile as a better framework. The post fails to mention the real strengths of traditional project managment and the weaknesses of agile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post has a lot of factual errors and, IMHO, is just written to promote agile as a better framework. The post fails to mention the real strengths of traditional project managment and the weaknesses of agile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

