The CHAOS Report 2009 on IT Project Failure

June 16, 2009 | Author: PM Hut | Filed under: Uncategorized

The CHAOS Report 2009 on IT Project Failure
By Jorge Dominguez

The Standish Group collects information on project failures in the IT industry and environments with the objective of making the industry more successful and to show ways to improve its success rates and increase the value of the IT investments. The latest results have been compiled into the CHAOS Report 2009 published by the organization in April.

Problem: it measures success by only looking at whether the projects were completed on time, on budget, and with required features and functions (met user requirements). What happened to the rest of the “six triple constraint”!

The organization leaves out of its measures the quality, the risk, and customer satisfaction. Not that we are complaining. They have the right to measure whatever they want and we have stated before that we have to consider the CHAOS Report results in a recent article on my theory on why IT projects fail. But we, PMs, already know that all these measurements work in tandem and need to keep this in mind.

2009 Chaos Report

CHAOS Report – Pie Chart

The report shows that software projects now have a 32% success rate compared to 35% from the previous study in 2006 and 16% in 1994. On the other hand, 44% of projects were challenged (late, over budget and/or with less than the required features and functions) while 24% failed (cancelled prior to completion or delivered and never used).

  Year 2009 Year 2006 Year 2004 Year 2002 Year 2000 Year 1998 Year 1996 Year 1994
Successful 32% 35% 29% 34% 28% 26% 27% 16%
Challenged 44% 19% 53% 15% 23% 28% 40% 31%
Failed 24% 46% 18% 51% 49% 46% 33% 53%

So, must we conclude that project success is a little worse than in 2006 (32% vs. 35%) but definitely better than in 1994 (16%)? For sure, there is better project management expertise (more certified project managers), better training, and better tools and techniques. On the other hand, project complexity and environments have increased while the time to deliver has been reduced. Look at the table above and make your own conclusions.

In our opinion, project success in IT has improved when looking at all the many angles that are not being considered by the CHAOS Report. Nevertheless, the figures are still low and need to improve much more.

Still, the CHAOS Report continues to be an important measure for the IT industry in spite leaving a lot of curious minds wandering about the methods used.

Jorge Dominguez, PMP®

Related Articles

6 people have left comments

Interesting statistics. You’d think that we’d be better at implementing IT projects at this point. I’d love to see Waterfall vs. Agile breakdowns of these statistics, if they’re available.

Phil Simon wrote on January 7, 2010 - 7:43 pm | Visit Link

Great post Jorge! I recently started blogging and incorporated a link to this blog in a recent post of mine.

I am thinking about an upcoming post where I would like to discuss executive commitment to project management best practices and its effect on the success of projects. I have seen many organizations implementing a watered down version of PM or PMO’s…some project templates and a task tracker. Until we have executives viewing PMs as business leaders and not just consultants providing project status, we will continue to see watered down success rates.

Robert Kelly wrote on May 4, 2010 - 12:08 pm | Visit Link

[…] of project execution must be basically solved, right? Wrong. The Standish Group has found that 68% of technology projects failed in 2009. Does this mean that project management solutions are just a waste of […]

Can Technology Solve the Project Execution Problem? – PM Hut wrote on June 14, 2010 - 1:59 pm | Visit Link

[…] I am disappointed at the high rate of project failures in the software industry. According to the 2009 report from the Standish Group, almost 68% of the projects were canceled, delivered late, did not meet product specifications or […]

Project Estimation Using “Use Cases” – PM Hut wrote on July 5, 2010 - 9:28 am | Visit Link

It appears that you have transposed many of your Challenged and Failed rows of figures above, i.e. compare them with those published in Eveleen & Verhof’s article in IEEE Software, here: Years 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2006 all differ; only 2004 & 2009 are the same as yours. Or are their figures wrong?
Where did you get your figures for 2002, which Eveleen & Verhof do not include?

Joe Barwell wrote on September 29, 2011 - 10:29 pm | Visit Link

It honestly is my first time being exposed to project management.Done correctly it’s fruits can be monetarily rewarding for those involved.My novice interpretation is that project management is no different than any other art form,all of it’s components must fall into place an act as one, otherwise the project can turn into a genuine waste of time and money.It is interesting to note how many areas comprise project management,if a project is sucessfull the experience of building it from the ground up can be both a rewarding and exciting experience.

Gabriel Guevara wrote on September 3, 2012 - 11:12 pm | Visit Link

feel free to leave a comment

Comment Guidelines: Basic XHTML is allowed (a href, strong, em, code). All line breaks and paragraphs are automatically generated. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Email addresses will never be published. Keep it PG-13 people!

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

All fields marked with " * " are required.

Project Management Categories